
I work as a commercial construction estimator and preconstruction consultant, and I’ve been doing so for a little over 12 years. Most of my work sits at the intersection of design, budgeting, and risk—helping owners, developers, and contractors understand what a project will really cost before they commit.
The people who usually get the most value are developers, general contractors, architects, and property managers. In short, anyone who needs real numbers—not optimistic guesses—so they can make confident decisions early.
One of the biggest mistakes I see when people hire an estimating company is choosing purely on price. An estimate that looks “cheap” on paper often omits scope, escalation, and coordination with trades, and the bill shows up later during construction. Another common issue is hiring firms that don’t specialize in commercial work or don’t explain their assumptions. If there’s no backup, no notes, and no questions, that’s usually a bad sign.
When I evaluate an estimating company, I look for proven experience in similar project types, transparency in how they build numbers, and the ability to communicate clearly. Software matters—but process matters more. I want to see historical cost data, vendor relationships, and evidence that their budgets closely align with final construction costs.
A quick example: a developer once came to us with a conceptual budget from another firm. When we reviewed it, we found missing site utilities, escalation, and light structural allowances. Catching those early allowed the team to adjust the design and avoid what would have been a very expensive surprise later. On another project—a tenant improvement—we clarified the vague mechanical scope with the trades before pricing went out. The GC avoided multiple change orders and weeks of delay simply because expectations were clear from the start.
I’ve also seen it go the other way. A project team chose the lowest-cost estimator, who failed to include ADA upgrades and fire protection requirements. The job ended up nearly twenty percent over budget after the award. Nobody was happy—and it could have been prevented with better due diligence.
I specialize in retail, light industrial, healthcare clinics, schools, and office/tenant improvements, with some ground-up commercial work mixed in. Each of these markets has its own risks, so familiarity really matters.
For tools, I use digital takeoff programs and structured estimating platforms, supported by internal and published cost databases. But the real difference comes from documenting assumptions, verifying scope with trades, and updating estimates as design evolves. Accuracy isn’t just math—it’s communication.
Yes—I do provide estimating services. My approach focuses on clarity: detailed line items, clear assumptions, realistic contingencies, and collaboration with the design and construction teams instead of pricing in isolation. My goal is to help projects succeed, not create numbers that only look good on paper.
If you’d like, I can tighten this even more—or shape it to sound more casual, more “expert,” or more marketing-driven. Tell me the tone you’re going for.
Trade-specific accuracy matters—for example, learn how drywall estimating services prevent budget surprises on complex builds